markwelch
June 29th, 2009, 09:10 PM
Which specific states have seen local web publishers terminated by which merchants?
We know that Amazon has now terminated its advertising relationships with web publishers in three states (North Carolina (http://forum.abestweb.com/forumdisplay.php?f=549), Rhode Island and Hawaii (http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=121138)), as bills in those states with "immediate effect" language headed toward the governors' desks. Amazon has also threatened to terminate its advertising relationships with web publishers in other states which enact "Amazon Tax" legislation (most notably California (http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=120899)).
We must also recall that Fingerhut, Hammacher Schlemmer, and several other merchants have terminated their advertising relationships with web publishers in Connecticut (http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=117855) out of concern about "immediate effect" language in that state's pending bill. (I thought there were similar terminations in Maryland (http://forum.abestweb.com/forumdisplay.php?f=550), but today I can't find any posts about this. Similar bills were also pending in Minnesota (http://forum.abestweb.com/forumdisplay.php?f=544) and Tennessee (http://forum.abestweb.com/forumdisplay.php?f=546).) The legislation appears stalled in these four states (but we might still find the "Amazon Tax" language secretly inserted into their budget bills (http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=120937)).
Of course, we can't forget that hundreds of merchants have ended their advertising relationships with tens of thousands of web publishers in New York (http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=105869), after that state became the first to enact "Amazon Tax" language last year.
We know that Amazon has now terminated its advertising relationships with web publishers in three states (North Carolina (http://forum.abestweb.com/forumdisplay.php?f=549), Rhode Island and Hawaii (http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=121138)), as bills in those states with "immediate effect" language headed toward the governors' desks. Amazon has also threatened to terminate its advertising relationships with web publishers in other states which enact "Amazon Tax" legislation (most notably California (http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=120899)).
We must also recall that Fingerhut, Hammacher Schlemmer, and several other merchants have terminated their advertising relationships with web publishers in Connecticut (http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=117855) out of concern about "immediate effect" language in that state's pending bill. (I thought there were similar terminations in Maryland (http://forum.abestweb.com/forumdisplay.php?f=550), but today I can't find any posts about this. Similar bills were also pending in Minnesota (http://forum.abestweb.com/forumdisplay.php?f=544) and Tennessee (http://forum.abestweb.com/forumdisplay.php?f=546).) The legislation appears stalled in these four states (but we might still find the "Amazon Tax" language secretly inserted into their budget bills (http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=120937)).
Of course, we can't forget that hundreds of merchants have ended their advertising relationships with tens of thousands of web publishers in New York (http://forum.abestweb.com/showthread.php?t=105869), after that state became the first to enact "Amazon Tax" language last year.
