DesignerWiz
December 26th, 2002, 06:08 PM
We have been running a small testing on buttontool.com for approx. 60 days:
Accumulated:
Raw Clicks: 899
Unique Clicks: 834
Sales generated: 0 0
Clicks per Sale (CPS): n/a n/a
Commissions Earned: $0 $0
Paid so far: $0 $0
We also invited buttontool.com reps a highly visible "non competitive" promotion spot for special embedded ID# within the software unit itself. They gave us a complete run around and wanted a lot of information before even considering such a thought when we informed them of our concerns of these numbers. They also stated that our concern was indeed very strange and they would get back to us. Hmmm .. no word yet. Considering our worst producing software in same software category averages 18 - 22 sales per 100 viewers.
Seems to us as though 1 sale out of 899 would be appropriate. Don't you think?
DesignerWiz
http://DesignerWiz.com
Accumulated:
Raw Clicks: 899
Unique Clicks: 834
Sales generated: 0 0
Clicks per Sale (CPS): n/a n/a
Commissions Earned: $0 $0
Paid so far: $0 $0
We also invited buttontool.com reps a highly visible "non competitive" promotion spot for special embedded ID# within the software unit itself. They gave us a complete run around and wanted a lot of information before even considering such a thought when we informed them of our concerns of these numbers. They also stated that our concern was indeed very strange and they would get back to us. Hmmm .. no word yet. Considering our worst producing software in same software category averages 18 - 22 sales per 100 viewers.
Seems to us as though 1 sale out of 899 would be appropriate. Don't you think?
DesignerWiz
http://DesignerWiz.com
