SEP-IRA VS. SEP-401k


View the full Thread by clicking here


Zdig
January 26th, 2006, 02:42 AM
Since it's close to tax time... does anyone prefer a SEP-IRA (http://personal.fidelity.com/products/retirement/getstart/newacc/sepira.shtml) to a SEP-401k (http://personal.fidelity.com/products/retirement/getstart/newacc/keogh.shtml) (or the other way around)

As I understand them, an SEP-IRA is much easier to maintain and is much lighter on paperwork/regulations etc... but an SEP-401k allows you to save much more money tax free. I'm fairly new to both of these...any thoughts? I'm leaning towards the SEP-IRA based on my research, but I think the SEP-401k might be worth the extra hassle if I can protect a higher % of my income from taxes.

MichaelColey
January 26th, 2006, 08:47 AM
Great post! I had never heard of the SEP-401k.

It looks like they have the same maximums: $42,000 for 2005 and $44,000 for 2006. If you earned more than $210,000 from your business in 2005 or will earn more than $220,000 in 2006, there is essentially no difference.

The difference between the two is that the SEP-IRA has a limit of 25% of income (actually 20%, since the amount you contribute is no longer considered income), while the SEP-401k has the same limits plus you can contribute up to an additional $15,000 ($20,000 if you're 50 or over).

Are you really able to save more than 20% of your income? If so, that's fantastic. Very few people can do that.

Another difference is that you can't have employees with the SEP-401k, while you can with the SEP-IRA. If you have employees or plan on hiring employees, that could be a deciding factor.

Donuts
January 26th, 2006, 10:55 AM
Is the SEP-401k you're referring to, the same thing as a "Solo 401K" (which I'm leaning towards setting up).

"Solo 401k" info:
http://retireplan.about.com/od/401kstrategies/a/solo_401k.htm

MichaelColey
January 26th, 2006, 11:10 AM
It looks like the same thing to me.

It was created in 2002, which would explain why I didn't hear about it. I've been doing my SEP-IRA longer than that, and haven't researched the alternatives since I started with my SEP-IRA.

Hmmm....

No tax returns for the plan are necessary, as long as assets remain under $100,000. If assets exceed $100,000, a simplified tax return may be filed.Also...The employer contribution portion is not subject to FICA (Social Security) or self-employment taxes (but any salary deferral portion is subject to tax).For those earning over $210,000, the maximum is the same for either plan, so an SEP-IRA is fine.

Zdig
January 26th, 2006, 12:41 PM
The difference between the two is that the SEP-IRA has a limit of 25% of income (actually 20%, since the amount you contribute is no longer considered income), while the SEP-401k has the same limits plus you can contribute up to an additional $15,000 ($20,000 if you're 50 or over).




so the SEP-401k allows you to stash away a max total $42,000 + $15,000 for 2005, correct? it seems like the SEP-401k allows you to save much more from being taxed?

Zdig
January 26th, 2006, 12:42 PM
It looks like the same thing to me.

It was created in 2002, which would explain why I didn't hear about it. I've been doing my SEP-IRA longer than that, and haven't researched the alternatives since I started with my SEP-IRA.


I think you can roll your SEP-IRA into a SEP-401k if you choose to switch

Zdig
January 26th, 2006, 12:52 PM
Are you really able to save more than 20% of your income? If so, that's fantastic. Very few people can do that.



I'm not sure yet, but I'm trying to figure out what the max is, so I have something to shoot for. : )

MichaelColey
January 26th, 2006, 03:43 PM
so the SEP-401k allows you to stash away a max total $42,000 + $15,000 for 2005, correct? it seems like the SEP-401k allows you to save much more from being taxed?No, if I'm reading it right, they both have a maximum of $42,000 for 2005. The difference is the percentage cap is effectively 20% on the SEP-IRA while the SEP-401k allows you to put in 20% + up to an additional $15,000 (still with a $42,000 total maximum and no more than 100% of your income).

Zdig
January 26th, 2006, 03:51 PM
did u see that comparison table on the SEP-401k link i posted?

"How a Self-Employed 401(k) contribution can add up
As you can see from the example below, a self-employed business owner who is age 50 with $100,000 in compensation may save up to $20,000 more with a Self-Employed 401(k) than with a SEP-IRA or Profit Sharing Plan."

MichaelColey
January 26th, 2006, 04:13 PM
It's only up to $20,000 more if you're over 50. Otherwise, it's up to $15,000 more. And if you make between $135,000 and $210,000, the difference is even less. Once you're at or above $210,000 (for 2005), they both have the same limit: $42,000.

Vinny O'Hare
January 26th, 2006, 04:46 PM
This is a good reason to start a business even if you are only going to employ yourself.

Zdig
January 26th, 2006, 09:45 PM
This is a good reason to start a business even if you are only going to employ yourself.

good point, this is yet another excellent reason to have your own business

        
ABestWeb Affiliate Marketing Forum
 TOP
Copyright (C) 2001 - , ABestWeb - All World Wide Rights Reserved
Trademarks are property of their respective owners
Content may not republished, in any manner, without prior written permission

ABestWeb Affiliate Marketing Forum