The ABW solution for the Tax issues!

June 25th, 2008, 06:10 PM
|
 |
Affiliate Manager
|
|
Join Date: September 26th, 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 949
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mellie
I think it's a fair solution. As a New York affiliate, I have no problem giving up payment on NY sales if it means I can still earn commission on all other sales.
|
I love the idea of a hybrid EPC/PPC model to combat the NYS tax law. Gregs post was fantastic, and should be looked at closely by all. Would this be just for NY resident clicks? Or for all clicks that an NY affiliate leads to a merchant?
Mellie - It is my understanding that even if a merchant doesn't pay you a CPA commission on sales you lead from NY residents, it will count against the nexus regardless. Am I right in my thinking?
I look forward to being proactive in trying to figure this out.
Brent
|

June 25th, 2008, 06:15 PM
|
 |
Affiliate Manager
|
|
Join Date: September 26th, 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 949
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brian - ShareASale
So doing this could put a merchant, or even a network, in a bad spot of legal limbo. Merchants who have dropped have chosen to do so because they didn't want to be in legal limbo and felt it was not worth the risk to do so.... We need to remove that risk and limbo if we are going to present them with a solution...
|
This is where CSN got hung up. The "gray" area of this law was to shady. Being presented with a solution outside of this "gray" area is imperative to this working. There are already ways of working around the law, however nobody knows how they will be interpretted by NYS in 6 months. That is a lot of risk for a merchant that brings in 20+ million a year from NYS residents alone.
|

June 25th, 2008, 07:59 PM
|
|
ABW Ambassador
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 1,687
|
|
Not sure Brent, the more I read and the more I think, the less I know for sure lol.
My current thought is that NY affiliate sales to NY residents can't be compensated on a per anything basis (either cpa or cpc) I have to read the definitions of nexus again. But it's been along day and my head is spinning, maybe tomorrow it'll be clearer. 
|

June 25th, 2008, 10:06 PM
|
 |
Analytics Dude
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,869
|
|
The reading of the law I favor (which by no means makes it absolute) indicates that a nexus is only presumed if affiliates engage in off line activities that directly promote a merchant, or e mail campaigns/ PPC campaigns that directly promote a merchant.
Short of that, a NY affiliate is not engaging in any activity that directly effects ANY merchants ability to do commerce in NY (as evidenced in thee Tyson Pipe case).
None of this has yet to be proven or disproved, so there you have it.
|

June 26th, 2008, 06:22 AM
|
|
ABW Ambassador
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 1,687
|
|
I think this is the first time I've quoted myself. I meant to say that I think to avoid what many see as the grey area of what is or isn't a nexus NY affs can't be compensated at all if there is also commission compensation for other sales. That being said giving up commission on NY sales still doen't bother me as much as losing everything so I really hope this is doable.
I think that the current understanding by most merchants and similar to Kevin's is accurate - NY afffiliates can't market merchants direct to NY residents (no email, direct ppc, newsletters mentioning merchants, no flyers, phone calls....). By a merchant saying they won't pay a NY affiliate on NY sales you pretty much guarentee we won't be targeting NYer's
My accountants & their lawyers concur and have told me they think that if I keep my business online and don't target NYer's I am not a nexus for a merchant. I can only promote my site and not merchants. I couldn't tell my sister to shop at CSN and give her my link but I could say go to my website and if she found you there good for her.
It sure will be nice to sit down in Albany with the lawyer and hopefully get some clarity so we can work out a solution.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mellie
Not sure Brent, the more I read and the more I think, the less I know for sure lol.
My current thought is that NY affiliate sales to NY residents can't be compensated on a per anything basis (either cpa or cpc) I have to read the definitions of nexus again. But it's been along day and my head is spinning, maybe tomorrow it'll be clearer. 
|
|

June 26th, 2008, 10:54 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 10,967
|
|
Be very careful making the CPC amount performance based. I think it's a very thin line and NY will likely consider any CPC that varies based on performance to be essentially the same as commissioning.
I think it's much cleaner and clearer if the sales by NY affiliates shipped to NY customers are non-commissionable.
I concur with the others who suggest that a legal professional should be consulted on this. In addition, someone might want to get NY to give an opinion. If you check out their web site, they allow companies to request opinions.
|

June 26th, 2008, 10:57 AM
|
 |
Troll Killer and best Snooper! I decide when the pigs fly!
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 6,016
|
|
I am also willing to kick in some money toward a NY tax lawyer and/or accountant to assess the legality of Haiko's proposal.
I'm psyched! Let's get something going!!!
|

June 26th, 2008, 11:14 AM
|
 |
Merchant & PM
|
|
Join Date: March 13th, 2006
Location: Colorado / Florida
Posts: 4,351
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MichaelColey
In addition, someone might want to get NY to give an opinion. If you check out their web site, they allow companies to request opinions.
|
I know that big heart of yours is in the right place MC. That fact stated, requesting an opinion from the state that passed the law to achieve their own special interest will not return an "objective" reply that will be of any benefit to what Affs and merchants are trying to accomplish.
The state opinion will always support what the state feels is in the best interest of propagating their own philosophy and intent. Past that, if you offer rebuttal or question the existence of a nexus under "x" scenarios, they will respond that you should consult an attorney. Been there a few times...
__________________
I don't twitter.....
|

June 26th, 2008, 11:51 AM
|
 |
Lite On The Do, Heavy On The Nuts
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 6,949
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Haiko de Poel, Jr.
I'll start with $1,000 for legal / accounting fees ... lets make this work.
|
Haiko, I'm good for $250. If funds are needed and you are collecting them at some time, just please email me and I can paypal it to you, zero strings, zero questions, no receipt - just consider your own $1k swelling by 25%.
I don't live in NY, but I see this as impacting me in the future, other states will surely follow. Now is the time to nip this.
|

June 26th, 2008, 12:13 PM
|
 |
ABW Founder
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 21,529
|
|
WOW, thanks Donuts!!!
I'm not doing the collecting and don't know who is but once I do I'll send them to ya.
__________________
Continued Success,
Haiko
The secret of success is constancy of purpose ~ Disraeli
|

June 26th, 2008, 12:31 PM
|
 |
aka "Beachy"
|
|
Join Date: November 20th, 2005
Location: At the Beach (West Fenwick, DE) or TPA@0W3
Posts: 3,559
|
|
Haiko, I'll certainly chip in another $100 to help "swell" your commitment if/when funds are needed. Same deal as Donuts' offer - no strings, PayPal or personal check, no receipt, no "conditions."
I (too) do not live in New York and will, in fact, be incorporating in Delaware by year end. However, this NY issue will have industry wide ramifications. I do believe that states with Sales and Use Tax laws will eventually recoup (some of) the brick & mortar taxes lost to Internet sales. But we, as an industry, need to know how and when they will do it - Black and White - no gray areas for (mis)interpretation) by the greedy and/or the shady.
|

June 26th, 2008, 12:56 PM
|
 |
Outsourced Program Manager
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,515
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Haiko de Poel, Jr.
WOW, thanks Donuts!!!
I'm not doing the collecting and don't know who is but once I do I'll send them to ya.
|
Count CMC in as well. We'll pledge at least $250. If you need more let me know. I think your idea is worth the investment.
|

June 26th, 2008, 01:22 PM
|
 |
Member
|
|
Join Date: June 28th, 2006
Posts: 101
|
|
Haiko, I'll do $100 also for the same reasons as Donuts and Beachy. If we all sit by and watch this happen to NY, then shame on us and who's going to be there when our "retirement" plan gets pulled out from under us. Thanks for stepping up to the plate and letting us hand you a bat or two.
Jim
|

June 26th, 2008, 01:24 PM
|
 |
ABW Founder
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 21,529
|
|
Amazing ... TY Greg and Jim ... this is how we solve problems!!!
__________________
Continued Success,
Haiko
The secret of success is constancy of purpose ~ Disraeli
|

June 26th, 2008, 01:26 PM
|
 |
Troll Killer and best Snooper! I decide when the pigs fly!
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 6,016
|
|
Hey, don't I get a thank you, too?
Sheesh.
I'll pony up at least $100. Anything more than that I have to clear with hubby.
|

June 26th, 2008, 01:29 PM
|
 |
ABW Founder
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 21,529
|
|
Rhea ... a hug a thank you and a high five!!!  
Together we will solve this issue!
__________________
Continued Success,
Haiko
The secret of success is constancy of purpose ~ Disraeli
|

June 26th, 2008, 01:56 PM
|
 |
Troll Killer and best Snooper! I decide when the pigs fly!
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 6,016
|
|
That's better! 
|

June 26th, 2008, 07:13 PM
|
 |
Merchant & PM
|
|
Join Date: March 13th, 2006
Location: Colorado / Florida
Posts: 4,351
|
|
Gang, if the purpose of the attorney is to get an opinion and / or way that NY affiliates and their out of state merchants can resume under exclusion from the NY law, I'll also donate to help out. I would like to keep any donation amounts confidential however.
If the purpose of the attorney is to contest the law, it will take a ton of money, potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars (or more) to see it through. I assume from what I've read here that the intent is to engage an attorney to render an opinion and guidance as to under what circumstances the nexus does not apply in "x,y,z" scenarios. But if there are any thoughts about challenging the law in court, you are looking at an entirely different expense level that we can all better support by donating to the big companies that have already filed to challenge.
__________________
I don't twitter.....
|

June 26th, 2008, 07:29 PM
|
 |
Super Dawg Member
|
|
Join Date: January 22nd, 2007
Location: West Covina, CA
Posts: 3,205
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alan Hamilton
If the purpose of the attorney is to contest the law, it will take a ton of money, potentially hundreds of thousands of dollars (or more) to see it through. I assume from what I've read here that the intent is to engage an attorney to render an opinion and guidance as to under what circumstances the nexus does not apply in "x,y,z" scenarios. But if there are any thoughts about challenging the law in court, you are looking at an entirely different expense level.
|
There are already two such suits pending and any additional case would only be consolidated with the pending cases. There is no rhyme or reason for another such case to be filed.
As to a consultation, much care must be taken in choosing such an attorney with whom to consult. To consult just a "NY tax attorney" could be a waste of time and resources. There needs to be found a NY tax attorney who is already familiar with both 1) the concept of affiliate marketing and 2) the specific issues with the new law. Otherwise, the attorney would be paid to spend hours researching basic information that he could already be familiar with. Also, even with research, he may still not grasp the concepts of affiliate marketing. This is a an area not well litigated and about which he would need to look outside traditional legal resources. Look at the DSW case, where the attorneys filing the case have totally mischaracterized what CJ actually does and their part in affiliate marketing.
It might be wise to consider consulting with one of the firms currently representing Amazon or Overstock, who appear well versed on all of the key issues.
__________________
 aarf
"It's inexcusable for scientists to torture animals; let them make their experiments on journalists and politicians." -Henrik Ibsen
I never linked my political blog, but here is my new sports blog theHoundDawgSportsBlog NFL Predictions posted 9/8/09
"I wouldn't touch the metric system with a 3.048 meter pole." - Woody Paige
|

June 26th, 2008, 07:44 PM
|
 |
Super Dawg Member
|
|
Join Date: January 22nd, 2007
Location: West Covina, CA
Posts: 3,205
|
|
As to the filing of a separate lawsuit on behalf of affiliates, it may well be that affiliates would not have legal standing to file such a suit, as affiliates do not collect sales tax, and it may well be that unless a party would directly come under the purview of the law by being required to collect sales tax, they could not sue.
__________________
 aarf
"It's inexcusable for scientists to torture animals; let them make their experiments on journalists and politicians." -Henrik Ibsen
I never linked my political blog, but here is my new sports blog theHoundDawgSportsBlog NFL Predictions posted 9/8/09
"I wouldn't touch the metric system with a 3.048 meter pole." - Woody Paige
|

June 26th, 2008, 08:40 PM
|
 |
Merchant & PM
|
|
Join Date: March 13th, 2006
Location: Colorado / Florida
Posts: 4,351
|
|
I agree on all points Hound. I also underscore the importance of digging deep to find a firm that has a true working knowledge of the new law, as well as experience in internet marketing relationships. There are very few, very few attorneys who have hands on knowledge with both. Because someone is an attorney does not qualify them to be an expert in this special field, so be diligent in the selection for sure.
__________________
I don't twitter.....
|

June 27th, 2008, 11:15 AM
|
 |
Lite On The Do, Heavy On The Nuts
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 6,949
|
|
I'm pleased with how this thread has progressed. We must support our NY breathren and sisteren. Our self-interests are at stake here. Plus, sweethearts like Mellie, a good heart trying to make a living ethicallly, and the many like her, do not deserve this kind of treatment from her home state. We must do more to protect our own. H, thanks for starting the money line here, steps like that are SO easy to follow. I'm in line, behind you. Mellie, hand in there, your friends are ready to fight with you. I don't know if we can make a difference, but I do know that we will try.
|

June 27th, 2008, 11:34 AM
|
 |
ABW Ambassador
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,484
|
|
I'll match donuts in dollars and conditions.
LMK where to send it.
|

June 27th, 2008, 11:39 AM
|
 |
Analytics Dude
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,869
|
|
I have access to a Buffalo based attorney familiar with the Amazon tax. Drop me a line, H.
|

June 27th, 2008, 11:42 AM
|
 |
ABW Founder
|
|
Join Date: January 18th, 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 21,529
|
|
I've confirmed that Performics merchants can offer CPC for some affiliates and CPA for others based on a segregated list of affiliates who live/operate in XX state (ie. NY)
Legal opinions for such actions should be sought by each individual merchant.
Thank you Performics for your consideration, review and input!
__________________
Continued Success,
Haiko
The secret of success is constancy of purpose ~ Disraeli
|
|
| Tools |
Search |
|
|
|
| Display |
Linear Mode
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads,
You may not post replies,
You may not post attachments,
You may not edit your posts
|
|
|